The government’s decision around Sanchar Saathi has become one of the most debated digital-policy developments of December 2025. Initially declared mandatory on all new smartphones sold in India — and on older devices via updates — the directive sparked a nationwide debate about privacy, surveillance, and citizens’ rights. Within days, the government backtracked, making the pre-installation optional. This article traces what Sanchar Saathi is, what the original order entailed, why it provoked controversy, and what the rollback means for users, privacy, and digital governance in India.
What is Sanchar Saathi?
Sanchar Saathi is a cybersecurity and telecom-safety initiative by the government of India through the Department of Telecommunications (DoT).
Key features of Sanchar Saathi:
- IMEI Verification: Users can check if a mobile handset is genuine using its International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) number — helping to detect counterfeit or tampered devices.
- Fraud Reporting: The app allows users to report suspected fraudulent calls or messages and suspicious telecom connections, aiming to curb scams and misuse.
- Lost / Stolen Phone Tracking & Blocking: In the event of theft or loss, users can report the phone via the app/portal — thereby enabling blocking or blacklisting of stolen devices.
- Appeal to Citizen Participation: According to the government, Sanchar Saathi is meant to be a citizen-driven platform — enabling individuals to protect their own mobile identity rather than relying solely on law-enforcement or corporate measures.
Appeal to Citizen Participation: According to the government, Sanchar Saathi is meant to be a citizen-driven platform — enabling individuals to protect their own mobile identity rather than relying solely on law-enforcement or corporate measures.
The November 28 Directive: Making Sanchar Saathi Mandatory
On 28 November 2025, the DoT issued a directive requiring all smartphones manufactured or imported for sale in India to have Sanchar Saathi pre-installed.
Key aspects of the directive:
- The app must be visible and easy to use during the device’s initial setup — i.e., when a user turns the phone on for the first time.
- Manufacturers (OEMs) were prohibited from disabling or restricting any of the app’s features — meaning it had to be fully functional from the start.
- Compliance timeline: smartphone makers were given 90 days to comply for new phones; existing devices in stores were to receive the app via software updates, with a 120-day window to report compliance.
This move marked a significant step, because if implemented, Sanchar Saathi would have become a default presence on virtually every smartphone sold in India.
The official rationale: by bundling the app with all devices, even those sold to citizens who may not be tech-savvy or aware of its existence, the government aimed to make reporting fraud, checking IMEIs, and securing devices accessible to all Indians.
The Backlash: Why Many Opposed the Mandatory Pre-Installation
The directive provoked immediate and widespread criticism from privacy advocates, political opposition, tech companies, and civil society for multiple reasons:
Concerns Over Privacy & Surveillance
- Critics — including opposition leaders — argued that a state-developed app preinstalled on all phones amounts to a potential surveillance tool.
- The idea of a possibly “undeletable” or non-removable app alarmed many, as that would give the state persistent access to users’ devices — their telephony, metadata, maybe even location.
- Opposition leaders described the order as unconstitutional — claiming it violated the fundamental right to privacy and liberty under Article 21.
Tech Industry Pushback
- Major smartphone makers expressed reluctance or outright refusal, because many have internal policies forbidding pre-installation of third-party or government apps.
- Industry stakeholders reportedly warned that forcing this directive could raise legal and compliance issues, especially given diversity of devices, supply-chains, and global distribution.
Concerns Among Citizens and Rights Groups
- Civil-liberties groups and many citizens feared that even if optional now, this move could set a precedent for future mandatory state apps — undermining user autonomy.
- Several people feared that many users would be unaware of how to uninstall the app — or mistakenly think it is mandatory and keep it, undermining the claim of “voluntary use.” As some critics pointed out: pre-installation itself is a form of coercion, even if uninstalling is theoretically allowed.
Given the magnitude of criticism — privacy concerns, fear of surveillance, constitutional questions, and industry resistance — the pressure mounted quickly.
The U-Turn: Removal of Mandatory Pre-Installation
On 3 December 2025, just five days after issuing the mandate, the government officially withdrew the requirement to pre-install Sanchar Saathi on all smartphones.
In a press release, the DoT said the decision came after witnessing a massive uptick in voluntary downloads — suggesting that many users were already adopting the app on their own.
According to the government:
- The app remains available for download via official channels (Play Store / App Store) — it is now fully optional.
- Users can delete or uninstall the app at any time — the government reaffirmed that there is no compulsion to keep it.
- The government clarified that the app does not enable call-monitoring or hidden surveillance; its functions only activate if the user voluntarily registers and uses the app.
- The reversal was described as responsive to public feedback — authorities said they are open to amending rules based on genuine concerns raised by citizens and experts.
Thus, as of now, Sanchar Saathi is voluntary — users can choose to download and use it, or ignore it.
What Sanchar Saathi’s Mandate and Rollback Means for India — Big Picture Implications
1. A New Approach to Telecom & Cybersecurity — But Also a Reminder of Limits
Sanchar Saathi represents an ambitious attempt by the Indian government to address longstanding problems: fake or tampered phones, stolen devices, telecom fraud, identity theft via multiple connections, and misuse of IMEIs. By offering a unified portal/app accessible to citizens, the government aimed to democratize telecom-fraud prevention.
However, the backlash and subsequent rollback illustrate the tradeoffs and limits that come with state-backed cybersecurity tools: overreach, potential privacy infringement, user distrust, and legal/constitutional challenges. The swift reversal suggests authorities recognized the political and social cost of forcing a nationwide mandate — especially when it touches on personal devices and data.
2. Citizen Autonomy and Digital Rights Won — For Now
By making Sanchar Saathi optional, the government restored to citizens the agency and choice over what apps they want on their devices. This move is being seen by many as a win for privacy, digital rights, and user consent.
For smartphone users — whether in major cities, small towns, or rural India — this decision underscores that digital safety cannot come at the cost of consent. Users who do not wish to use Sanchar Saathi are free to skip or uninstall it without legal or technical hindrance.
3. What It Says About Policy-Making in Digital India
The Sanchar Saathi saga reflects larger tensions in India’s evolving digital policy landscape: balancing cybersecurity and citizen protection with privacy, civil rights, and trust. The quick reversal shows government responsiveness — but also raises questions about how policies are drafted, consulted, and communicated.
Observers argue this decision should prompt greater transparency, public consultation, and impact assessment before enforcing nationwide digital mandates — especially when personal data and privacy are involved.
4. For Users: What You Should Know Now
- Sanchar Saathi remains live and available — you can still download and use it if you want to check IMEIs, report fraud, or secure your phone.
- Usage is entirely optional — if you don’t want it, you can skip it. There is no longer a requirement for phone makers to pre-install it.
- Uninstallation is allowed — according to government clarifications.
- Its intended purpose remains fraud prevention and device safety — but like with any app, users must choose with awareness about permissions, data handling, and privacy settings.
Challenges & Unanswered Questions: The Road Ahead for Sanchar Saathi
While the rollback addresses many of the immediate concerns, several issues remain unresolved — and are worth watching in coming months:
- Transparency & Oversight: Will the government publish the complete legal framework, data-collection practices, and privacy safeguards for Sanchar Saathi? Without transparency, trust remains fragile.
- User Awareness and Consent: Will regular users — especially in rural areas or small towns — be sufficiently informed about what the app does, how to use/uninstall it, and the implications of registering?
- Voluntary Adoption vs. Digital Divide: Fraud-prevention works only if a significant portion of users actively participates. Will voluntary adoption be enough to meaningfully reduce counterfeit handsets, stolen-phone misuse, or telecom-fraud at scale?
- Future Regulatory Moves: The withdrawal of the mandate now may not guarantee that similar policies won’t be attempted in future — especially as debates on digital ID, cybercrime, data security, and regulation intensify.
- Tech-Industry and User Trust: For government tools to succeed, manufacturers, users, and civil-society must trust the process. The earlier plan exposed fractures — the government will need to rebuild confidence.
Conclusion: Sanchar Saathi’s Reset — Opportunity & Caution
The journey of Sanchar Saathi over the past week — from a bold government mandate to a swift U-turn — highlights both the potential and perils of digital governance in India. As a tool, Sanchar Saathi offers real benefits: device verification, fraud reporting, and lost/stolen-phone protection. As a policy, forcing it universally risked undermining privacy, consent, and constitutional rights.
By retracting the mandatory pre-installation, the government acknowledged that digital safety cannot come at the expense of individual autonomy. The outcome is a win for citizen choice — but also a reminder that any future digital-policy decisions must proceed with transparency, public consultation, and respect for privacy.
For smartphone users across India — whether in metropolitan cities or small towns like yours — the key takeaway is this: Sanchar Saathi remains an option, not an obligation. If you find value in its services, feel free to use it — but use informed, deliberate choice rather than compulsion.
As India continues its journey toward greater digital connectivity, cybersecurity and citizen rights must evolve hand in hand. Sanchar Saathi’s reset provides a moment to reflect, recalibrate, and engage — not just for policymakers, but for every user.
For more tech rlated updates, visit Lot Of Bits.
